Poll Result

ALS vote Aug 07

Report date: Tuesday 26 May 2026 15:55 UTC

Should Applicant 43 (Ynternet.org) be accredited as an At-Large Structure?

As at Poll close: Thursday 06 September 2007 12:00 UTC
Number of voters: 11 · Group size: 19 · Percentage voted: 57.89
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)

Ranked by votes

Rank	Application	Votes	%	Voters
1	Yes	11	100.00	11 anonymous
2	No	0	0.00
2	Abstain	0	0.00
Total votes (excluding Abstain):		11

Why did you vote against accreditation of (43) Ynternet.org?

No Placards in this Poll

Should Applicant 73 (Communica.ch) be accredited as an ALS?

As at Poll close: Thursday 06 September 2007 12:00 UTC
Number of voters: 10 · Group size: 19 · Percentage voted: 52.63
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)

Ranked by votes

Rank	Application	Votes	%	Voters
1	Yes	10	100.00	10 anonymous
2	No	0	0.00
2	Abstain	0	0.00
Total votes (excluding Abstain):		10

Why did you vote against accreditation of (73) Communca.ch?

No Placards in this Poll

Should Applicant 92 (National Consumers' League of Jamaica) be accredited as an ALS?

As at Poll close: Thursday 06 September 2007 12:00 UTC
Number of voters: 10 · Group size: 19 · Percentage voted: 52.63
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)

Ranked by votes

Rank	Application	Votes	%	Voters
1	Yes	9	90.00	9 anonymous
2	Abstain	1	10.00	1 anonymous
3	No	0	0.00
Total votes (excluding Abstain):		9

Why did you vote against accreditation of (92) National Consumers League of Jamaica?

No Placards in this Poll

Should applicant 89 (Slovenian Consumers Association (ZPS)) be accredited as an ALS?

As at Poll close: Thursday 06 September 2007 12:00 UTC
Number of voters: 10 · Group size: 19 · Percentage voted: 52.63
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)

Ranked by votes

Rank	Application	Votes	%	Voters
1	Yes	10	100.00	10 anonymous
2	No	0	0.00
2	Abstain	0	0.00
Total votes (excluding Abstain):		10

Why did you vote against accreditation of applicant 89 (Slovenian Consumers Association (ZPS))?

No Placards in this Poll

Should Applicant 101 (ISOC Wallonie) be accredited as an ALS?

As at Poll close: Thursday 06 September 2007 12:00 UTC
Number of voters: 10 · Group size: 19 · Percentage voted: 52.63
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)

Ranked by votes

Rank	Application	Votes	%	Voters
1	Yes	10	100.00	10 anonymous
2	No	0	0.00
2	Abstain	0	0.00
Total votes (excluding Abstain):		10

Why did you vote against accreditation of applicant 101 (ISOC Wallonie)?

No Placards in this Poll

Returning Officer

Signature:                                 
Name:                                      
Date:                                      

Scrutineers

Signature:                                 
Name:                                      
Date:                                      

Signature:                                 
Name:                                      
Date:

Results generated by BigPulse Online Voting